UltimateMovieRankings (UMR) has been ranking movies since 2011. Movies are ranked by using a combination of box office grosses, reviews, and awards. So far we have ranked 36,000 movies, written over 8,500 pages, been viewed over 25 million times, won three website awards, and have received over 50,000 comments on our pages.
Our vital links: Site Index, Newest Pages & Request Hotline. The Trending Now Sidebar lists our most popular pages in the last 24 hours.
Our Site Index lets you see what movie subjects we have already written about. The index lists the movie subjects alphabetically. Subjects go from classic performers like Clark Gable and Charlie Chaplin to the stars of the 1960s like Marlon Brando, Elizabeth Taylor and Paul Newman to today’s most popular stars like Sandra Bullock, Channing Tatum and Chris Pratt.
We like ranking movies…and that is what this website is all about. And we are not talking about a Top Ten list…we are talking about ranking all the movies in somebody’s career from Best to Worst. The criteria used for the rankings is box office grosses, critic reviews, audience voting, and award recognition. Every day the amount of movies ranked by Ultimate Movie Rankings increases ….our tally is now over 25,000 movies. The number one ranked movie is The Godfather ….coming in last is Kirk Cameron’s Saving Christmas. Thankfully our pages have been well received. Recently we crossed the 15 million view mark and are now read in over 230 different countries.
How we got here.
Sometime in 2010, for the millionth time I was looking at Joel Hirschhorn’s book Rating The Movie Stars (1983) when I wondered had he updated his ratings lately? A quick internet check provided the sad news that Mr. Hirchhorn had passed away in 2005. About a month later, I thought I could update the ratings. I then came up with an idea to create a mathematical equation that would create a numerical score for each movie. The first thing I had to come up with were factors for the equation.
So I thought….if I were producing a movie, what would I like to see my movie accomplish. The first thing I would want would be for the movie to be successful at the box office. Secondly, I would like the critics and moviegoers to enjoy my movie. And finally, I would like my movie to receive award recognition through Golden Globe® and Oscar® ceremonies.
There are all kinds of ways to determine if you want to see or skip a movie. You can depend on your favorite critic. My favorites are the late great Roger Ebert and Leonard Maltin. You might go to Rotten Tomatoes to get the consensus of all the critics. You might watch the viewer ratings at Yahoo Movies and IMDB. You might depend on which movies are doing the best at the box office. You might wait for the end of the year awards.
Ultimate Movie Rankings (UMR) Score takes all of these options and creates a mathematical equation that generates a score from 1 to 100. The higher the score the better the movie. A “good ” movie score = 60 or above. So anything above 60 should be a good movie to check out. This gives a good comparison number between centuries and now my wife and I can argue over the merits of her favorite, The Sound of Music and one of my favorites, Pulp Fiction using the same scoring criteria.
So far, I’ve generated scores for 36,000+ movies. With these scores, I’ve written 1,000+ web pages with a focus on actors/actresses and similar groups (Star Trek vs Star Wars, Top 100 Sports Movies are examples).
So let’s look at the breakdown of the variables in the equation.
1. Box office results. Receives the second-highest percentage (30%) of the equation. The ceiling was 200 million in adjusted for inflation dollars. Any movie that crossed 200 million maxed out the points in the category.
2. Critics and audience reception. Receives the highest percentage (46%) of the equation. So where do I find critics/audience reception? I use many different sources: RottenTomatoes, IMDb, MetaCritic, Yahoo Movies, Roger Ebert, Leonard Maltin, and Fandango. Put them all together and I get an average with 100% being the highest score possible. Sadly with the passing of my all-time favorite critic, Roger Ebert, I needed a new source….after much research…..our latest movie critic and taking Mr. Ebert’s spot is YouTube movie reviewer Chris Stuckmann.
3. Award Recognition. The final part of the equation is worth 24%. A movie gets points for Golden Globe® and Oscar® nominations and wins. The Golden Globes get 5% while the Oscars® get 13% of the equation. The last 6% goes to the amount of Oscar® nominations and the amount of Oscar® wins.
One way to see how the scores are calculated:
Top 200 Box Office Hits with Inflation + Top 100 Best Reviewed Movies + 88 Best Picture Oscar Winners = Top 100 UMR Score Movies
In January of 2011, we published our first Ultimate Movie Ranking (UMR) Score table on HubPages.com…we picked one of our favorite actors, Bruce Willis, to be the guinea pig. We have updated his page countless times over the years.
12.46am Manchester, England.
HAPPY NEW YEAR BRUCE, WoC, COGERSON CLAN AND THE UMR REGULARS!!!
Watching Dr. Strangelove, first film of 2019!
🙂
12:04 AM Virginia Beach, Virgina,United States of America. Happy New Year to you Steve. My last comment of 2018 was to Dan….my first comment of 2019 was to you. So I am trailing you in movies watched for the year….I will see if I can catch up. Dr. Strangelove is a great way to start the year. Hope 2019 is an awesome year for you.
Jon Voight comments I posted are not showing. Tried a couple of times and it says it’s a duplicate comment but nothing there.
Hey Dan…for some reason it got sent to the Spam folder….I just retrieved it and approved it. Sorry about that. The spammers are hitting the website pretty hard over the last few weeks…sorry that your Voight comment got caught in the crossfires….but it is now posted. Will respond a little later today…working on our “year end UMR page”.
Hello Bruce and everybody,
And here, come from the depths of time, the new article dedicated to the exciting American box office of the silent era : 1927 top 31-40 !
http://www.boxofficestory.com/box-office-usa-1927-top-31-a-40-a148922778
Good reading.
Hey Laurent….very very cool. I will use this as a source of information when I do our 1927 page. Good stuff as always. Now I am going to bed…the end of a very long week. Will finish the rest of the comments in the AM.
Thank you Bruce for your kind words.
You are most certainly welcome.
Have you ever wondered why the (number of tickets) gap between “The Sound of Music” and “Dr. Zhivago” is what it is? They were released the same year. “Sound of Music’s” lifetime earnings were about 23% greater than “Zhivago’s”, yet when adjusting for inflation, the gap shrinks to 15%. “Sound of Music” only had 1 release so all of its dollars were 1965 dollars. Some of “Zhivago’s” dollars were post-1965, inflation-reduced dollars — so the adjusted gap should have gotten larger, not smaller. Thanks!
Hey Sidney. Good question. According to Variety…..The Sound of Music had rentals around 80 million, while the Doctor had rentals a little under 48 million. Box office mojo does awesome with current movies, but is suspect with older movies. They were the two biggest hits of the 1960s…and both are in Top 10 when looking at the all-time adjusted hits. Some of the “unexplained” difference could be different pricing for the movies…as maybe the studios earned more, via different distribution plans. Sadly the answer will never be known. We feel our estimated grosses are pretty accurate…..but we realize we can neither prove or disprove it. Sorry we do not have a better answer.
In fact Sound Of Music was re-release in 1968 and he brought back $ 628,435 in the only 215 theatres keys of Variety. But I do not know the total recipe. Then in 1973, he grossed $3,336,558 in the key towns of Variety during it’s new re-release, and $23,993,727 throughout the country, for $11,000,000 rentals. It was also in 1978 ($253,373) and 1990 ($657,168). In fact he reported $126,505,564 on the firs release if I believe my sources.
Doctor Zhivago re-released each year between 1968 and 1974 (except in 1973) and reported a total of $3,956,437 in key halls of Variety only, for a total of $7,999,000 rental. Variety announced on 01/07/1970 that the film had grossed in the US $38,243,000 rental. In 2009, Variety gives the cumulative cumulative grosses of $111,721,910.
To conclude, I think that Mojo took good account of the result of the first exploitation plus the re-releases of Sound Of Music, but took the cumulative recipe of Doctor Zhivago as thet of the initial release. And in this case we arrive at 15% difference.
Best September Ever…..Thank you!
2018 – 347,600 views up 8.17% over our previous best September (2016)
2017 – 295,125 views
2016 – 321,332 views
2015 – 107,439 views